![The Lazarus Project Torrent Tpb The Lazarus Project Torrent Tpb](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/f2/03/74/f203741c01330687b3c8c65d069686e2--the-lazarus-project-paul-walker.jpg)
They too felt abused by their boss apparently, and went to a cybercafe to send some emails accusing the boss of corruption and a dozen four-letter word things. However, eventually a user abused the law, and now I'm answering in their place in a defamation case, perhaps being forced to pay thousands in damages - alleging I allowed the defamation by not following the law.
![The Lazarus Project Torrent Tpb The Lazarus Project Torrent Tpb](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zlucL1eGLfc/maxresdefault.jpg)
For example I refused to comply with a local law requiring me to check ID for every user that used a computer at the cybercafe. Cheating on taxes, drinking a beer in the wrong place/time, smoking a joint, downloading copyrighted things, running a red light, all of these things could set you up as a target for someone who wants to make an example out of you or whatever. It may be a small issue, it may be a stupid law, but if someone picks you out for punishment, you could be set up, screwed, and ruined big-time.
![The Lazarus Project Torrent Tpb The Lazarus Project Torrent Tpb](https://www.cloudninecomics.com/media/l/lazarus_5_9.4_tpb.jpg)
You are essentially risking punishment for ignoring the law.
THE LAZARUS PROJECT TORRENT TPB HOW TO
But it does raise the issue of how to disagree with the law, disobey it, without being punished for it.
THE LAZARUS PROJECT TORRENT TPB DOWNLOAD
It seems that these "researches" simply can't grasp the idea that a lot of these people get a kick out of sharing for sharing's sake and that respect (and maybe credits toward their future download ratio at private sites) is all they're looking to receive. All of which is essentially bullshit, unless there is some secret deal where TPB and other sites are cutting big checks to Axxo and Klaxxon and all these other guys who are out there spreading content around, which I doubt. That would be fucking absurd of them to claim *that*.Īnd, finally, yes, they actually do say that the incentive for most of the uploaders is that they get revenue from ads on the indexing sites as well as money from VIP subscriptions to the sites for faster bandwidth. Also, again, they're saying that 100 people are responsible for that much content. You can assume that they're counting scene release accounts as one person, when they're probably many more. Second, they claim that 100 people are responsible for almost all of the UPLOADS (that is, 100 people are responsible for almost all of the content being put out there). They're stressing points about "piracy" when one site isn't even "piracy" related and the other is. So, the source of their data is clearly flawed. Anyway, the point being, who the fuck still uses TPB and how is it a relevant source of data on Bit Torrent anymore? The other is The Pirate Bay, which I don't even know what the hell the current status is, because I remember they sold themselves, then they didn't sell themselves, then they did and created two new public indexers, then were going to go legit and. One is Mininova, which doesn't deal in material that infringes copyright and hasn't for a year and a half. The only source of data for their study are two sites. Unless I’m missing something, this whole article comes across as another one of these ridiculous studies where after 3 years of research and a few million dollars they reveal that fire is hot and scissors can be sharp. I can’t imagine that big media hasn’t been trying unsuccessfully to shut this group down for quite a while. I think it’s already recognized by most people that the bulk of pirated content originates from a small number of sources. If the media industry had any way of actually doing this, it would have been done a long time ago. It almost seems like these guys asked themselves “why do they do it”, looked at a torrent site, saw the ads, and just said “ah, that’s why” and wrote a paper.Īlso, the suggestion in this article to provide “disincentives” to the people uploading the bulk of pirated content is kind of obvious and silly. Are they saying that the people who post the bulk of the infringing torrents on various networks receive ad-revenue from the indexing sites (where the ads would be displayed)? I don’t understand how ad revenue flows from the indexing sites to the users who upload the content. I don’t really get (and the article didn’t really seem to explain) how these elite uploaders of the pirated content receive this ad-revenue.